Use one of these decorators if your component under test requires a Redux store:
withState(..)
withStore(..)
Example:
import { render, withState } from './test-utils'
it('shows loaded users', () => {
render(<Users />, withState({ users: [ { name: 'John' } ] }))
// ...
})
Note: Refer to the core library to learn more about how decorators can simplify writing tests for React components with React Testing Library.
- Installation
- Setup
- Test Scenarios
- Mock store
- Mock thunk middleware
- API
- Issues
- Changelog
- Contributors
- LICENSE
This library is distributed via npm, which is bundled with node and should be installed as one of your project's devDependencies
.
First, install the core library with a render function that supports decorators:
npm install --save-dev @render-with/decorators
Next, install the Redux decorators provided by this library:
npm install --save-dev @render-with/redux
or
for installation via yarn:
yarn add --dev @render-with/decorators
yarn add --dev @render-with/redux
This library has the following peerDependencies
:
and supports the following node
versions:
In your test-utils file, re-export the render function that supports decorators and the Redux decorators:
// test-utils.js
// ...
export * from '@testing-library/react' // makes all React Testing Library's exports available
export * from '@render-with/decorators' // overrides React Testing Library's render function
export * from '@render-with/redux' // makes decorators like withState(..) available
And finally, use the Redux decorators in your tests:
import { render, withState } from './test-utils'
it('shows loaded users', () => {
render(<Users />, withState({ users: [ { name: 'John' } ] }))
// ...
})
The following examples represent tests for this <Users />
component:
const Users = () => {
const users = useSelector(state => state.users)
const dispatch = useDispatch()
useEffect(() => {
dispatch(loadUsers())
}, [])
return (
<div>
<h1>Users</h1>
{users ? (
<ul>
users.map(user => <li>user</li>)
</ul>
) : (
<div>Loading users...</div>
)}
</div>
)
}
If your test does not care about the initial state, state changes, or dispatched actions, you can use the withStore(..)
decorator and omit the store argument. The decorator will create and use a mock store for you:
import { render, screen, withStore } from './test-utils'
it('shows loading indicator initially', () => {
render(<Users />, withStore())
expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
})
If your test cares about dispatched actions, you can pass a mock store and inspect the recorded actions:
import { render, screen, withStore, configureMockStore } from './test-utils'
it('loads users', () => {
const mockStore = configureMockStore()
render(<Users />, withStore(mockStore))
expect(mockStore.getActions()).toContainEqual(loadUsers())
})
If your test cares about the initial state, you can use the withState(..)
decorator:
import { render, screen, withState } from './test-utils'
it('loads users', () => {
render(<Users />, withState({ users: [ { name: 'John' } ] }))
expect(screen.getByRole('listitem')).toHaveTextContent('John')
})
If your test cares about state changes, you can pass an actual Redux store:
import { configureStore } from '@reduxjs/toolkit'
import { render, screen, withStore } from './test-utils'
it('shows loaded users', async () => {
fetch.mockResponse([ { name: 'John' } ])
const store = configureStore({ reducer: { users: usersReducer } })
render(<Users />, withStore(store))
expect(await screen.findByRole('listitem')).toHaveTextContent('John')
})
If not specified otherwise, the decorators will create, configure, and use a mock store defined by redux-mock-store
.
You can create, configure and pass your own mock store with createMockStore(..)
, which is re-exported by this library.
If not specified otherwise, the decorators will create a mock store using a mock-thunk middleware.
The mock thunk middleware will translate thunks into action objects with the { type: 'THUNK' }
and mocked thunks into action objects with the { type: 'MOCKED_THUNK' }
.
Replacing thunks with action objects is mainly done to avoid confusion when working with a mock store and thunks in tests.
Dispatched thunks will not be executed when using a mock store. Instead, they would end up in the recorded list of actions as follows:
console.log(mockStore.getActions()) // [ [Function] ]
This information is not very helpful and can be confusing when debugging a failing test. This is especially true when the thunks are defined as returning lambda functions (that have no name during runtime).
export const loadUsers = () => (dispatch, getState) => { /* ... */ }
And that's why the mock thunk middleware translates dispatched thunks into an action object with the type THUNK
:
console.log(mockStore.getActions()) // [ { type: 'THUNK' } ]
The problem gets worse when the thunks are mocked and no return value (function) is configured:
console.log(mockStore.getActions()) // [ undefined ]
That's why the mock thunk middleware translates mocked thunks into an action object with the type MOCKED_THUNK
:
console.log(mockStore.getActions()) // [ { type: 'MOCKED_THUNK' } ]
Note: This API reference uses simplified types. You can find the full type specification here.
function withState<S>(state?: State<S>): Decorator
Wraps component under test in a mock store initialized with the given state.
function withStore<S>(store?: Store<S>): Decorator
Wraps component under test in the given store.
function configureMockStore<S>(state?: S, middlewares?: Middleware[]): MockStore<S>
Returns a mock store initialized with the given state and configured to use the given middlewares.
const mockThunk: Middleware
A middleware that replaces thunks and mocked thunks with corresponding action objects.
Looking to contribute? PRs are welcome. Checkout this project's Issues on GitHub for existing issues.
Please file an issue for bugs, missing documentation, or unexpected behavior.
Please file an issue to suggest new features. Vote on feature requests by adding a 👍. This helps maintainers prioritize what to work on.
Please file an issue on the core project to suggest additional libraries that would benefit from decorators. Vote on library support adding a 👍. This helps maintainers prioritize what to work on.
For questions related to using the library, file an issue on GitHub.
Every release is documented on the GitHub Releases page.
Thanks goes to these people:
cultivate(software) 💼 💵 |
David Bieder 💻 |
Jerome Weiß 📖 🚇 🚧 |
Maurice Reichelt 📖 🚇 🚧 |
This project follows the all-contributors specification. Contributions of any kind welcome!