The missing DOM integration testing tool for Next.js.
Given a Next.js route, this library will render the matching page in JSDOM, provided with the expected props derived from Next.js' routing system and data fetching methods.
import { getPage } from 'next-page-tester';
import { screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
describe('Blog page', () => {
it('renders blog page', async () => {
const { render } = await getPage({
route: '/blog/1',
});
render();
expect(screen.getByText('Blog')).toBeInTheDocument();
fireEvent.click(screen.getByText('Link'));
await screen.findByText('Linked page');
});
});
The idea behind this library is to reproduce as closely as possible the way Next.js works without spinning up servers, and render the output in a local JSDOM environment.
In order to provide a valuable testing experience next-page-tester
replicates the rendering flow of an actual next.js
application:
- fetch data for a given route
-
render the server-side rendered result to JSDOM as plain html (including
head
element) - mount/hydrate the client application to the previously rendered html
The mounted application is interactive and can be tested with any DOM testing library (like @testing-library/react
).
next-page-tester
will take care of:
- loading and execute modules in the expected browser or server environments
- resolving provided routes into matching page component
- calling Next.js data fetching methods (
getServerSideProps
,getInitialProps
orgetStaticProps
) if the case - wrapping page with custom
_app
and_document
components - emulating client side navigation via
Link
,router.push
,router.replace
- handling pages'
redirect
returns - supporting
next/router
,next/head
,next/link
,next/config
and environment variables
getPage
accepts an option object and returns 4 values:
import { getPage } from 'next-page-tester';
const { render, serverRender, serverRenderToString, page } = await getPage({
options,
});
Type: () => { nextRoot: HTMLElement<NextRoot> }
Returns: #__next
root element element.
Unless you have an advanced use-case, you should mostly use this method. Under the hood it calls serverRender()
and then mounts/hydrates the React application into JSDOM #__next
root element. This is what users would get/see when they visit a page.
Type: () => { nextRoot: HTMLElement<NextRoot> }
Returns: #__next
root element element.
Inject the output of server side rendering into the DOM but doesn't mount React. Use it to test how Next.js renders in the following scenarios:
- before Reacts mounts
- when JS is disabled
- SEO tests
Type: () => { html: string }
Render the output of server side rendering as HTML string. This is a pure method without side-effects.
Type: React.ReactElement<AppElement>
React element of the application.
Property | Description | type | Default |
---|---|---|---|
route (mandatory) | Next route (must start with / ) |
string |
- |
req | Enhance default mocked request object | req => req |
- |
res | Enhance default mocked response object | res => res |
- |
router | Enhance default mocked Next router object | router => router |
- |
useApp | Render custom App component | boolean |
true |
|
Render Document component | boolean |
false |
nextRoot | Absolute path to Next.js root folder | string |
auto detected |
dotenvFile | Relative path to a .env file holding environment variables
|
string |
- |
wrappers | Absolute path to wrappers file. Useful to decorate component tree with mocked providers. | string |
- |
sharedModules | List of modules that should preserve identity between client and server context. | string[] |
[] |
If your pages/components import file types not natively handled by Node.js (like style sheets, images, .svg
, ...), you should configure your testing environment to properly process them. Eg, in case of Jest you might want configuring some moduleNameMapper
.
next-page-tester
expects to run into a JSDOM environment. If using Jest add this line to your jest
configuration:
"testEnvironment": "jsdom",
Since Next.js is not designed to run in a JSDOM environment we need to setup the default JSDOM to allow a smoother testing experience. By default, next-page-tester
will:
- Provide
window.scrollTo
andIntersectionObserver
mocks - Cleanup DOM after each test
- Setup jest to preserve the identity of some specific modules between "server" and "client" execution
However, you may choose to skip the auto cleanup & helpers initialisation by setting the NPT_SKIP_AUTO_SETUP
env variable to true
. You can do this with cross-env
like so:
cross-env NPT_SKIP_AUTO_SETUP=true jest
If using Jest v26 you might need to patch it in order to load modules with proper server/client environments. Maintenance efforts will target latest Jest version.
Under examples folder we're documenting the testing cases which next-page-tester
enables.
next-page-tester
focuses on supporting only the last version of Next.js and Jest:
next-page-tester | next.js | Jest |
---|---|---|
v0.1.0 -> v0.7.0 | v9.X.X | v26.X.X |
v0.8.0 -> v0.22.0 | v10.0.0 -> v10.0.7 | |
v0.23.0 -> v0.25.X | v10.0.8 -> v11.0.X | |
v0.26.0 -> v0.27.X | v10.0.8 -> v11.0.X | v27.X.X |
v0.28.0 -> v0.28.X | v11.1.0 | |
v0.29.0 + | v11.1.1 + |
Since:
- this project is not supported by Next.js team
- this project relies on a few Next.js internals which can change without notice in any version
please note that we cannot guarantee support for future versions of Next.js out of the box. Even patch or minor versions could break. In this case you'll have to wait for a new next-page-tester
version to be released.
Contributions are very welcome and we do our best to support external contributors.
- Data fetching methods' context
req
andres
objects are mocked with node-mocks-http - Next page tester is designed to be used with any testing framework/library but It's currently only tested with Jest and Testing Library. Feel free to open an issue if you had troubles with different setups
- It might be necessary to install
@types/react-dom
and@types/webpack
when using Typescript instrict
mode due to this bug
useDocument
option is partially implemented and might be unstable.
The first suggested way to mock network requests, consists of mocking at network layer with libraries like Mock service worker
and Mirage JS
.
Another viable approach might consist of mocking the global fetch
object with libraries like fetch-mock
.
In case you wanted a more traditional approach involving mocking the user land modules responsible for fetching data, you need to consider an extra step: since next-page-tester
isolates modules between "client" and "server" rendering, those mocks that are created in tests (client context) won't execute in server context (eg. data fetching methods).
To overcome that, we need to "taint" such modules to (preserve/share) their identity between "client" and "server" context by passing them through the sharedModules
option.
test('as a user I want to mock a module in client & server environment', async () => {
const stub = jest.spyOn(api, 'getData').mockReturnValue(Promise.resolve('data'))
const { render } = await getPage({
route: '/page',
nextRoot,
sharedModules: [`${process.cwd()}/src/path/to/my/module`],
});
expect(stub).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1); // this was executed in your data fetching method
}
You can set cookies by appending them to document.cookie
before calling getPage
. next-page-tester
will propagate cookies to ctx.req.headers.cookie
so they will be available to data fetching methods. This also applies to subsequent fetching methods calls triggered by client side navigation.
test('authenticated page', async () => {
document.cookie = 'SessionId=super=secret';
document.cookie = 'SomeOtherCookie=SomeOtherValue';
const { render } = await getPage({
route: '/authenticated',
});
render();
});
Note: document.cookie
does not get cleaned up automatically. You'll have to clear it manually after each test to keep everything in isolation.
Next.js Link
component invokes window.scrollTo
on click which is not implemented in JSDOM environment. In order to fix the error you should set up your test environment or provide your own window.scrollTo
mock.
This warning means that your page renders differently between server and browser. This can be an expected behavior or signal a bug in your code.
This warning means that your application during rendering process performs some network requests which have not been mocked. You should find them and mock as needed.
- Consider reusing Next.js code parts (not only types)
- Consider supporting Next.js
trailingSlash
option - Render custom
_error
page - Provide a
debug
option to log execution info
Thanks goes to these wonderful people (emoji key):
This project follows the all-contributors specification. Contributions of any kind welcome!